On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > One more thing > > Release 3.2 will need Java 8. Is it the moment to switch to Nashorn Engine > by default? > +1 for me but we need to make it clear wherever Javascript is used: - IfController - __javascript function - properties reference - jmeter.properties - changes.xml as Incompatible change > Someone have made test with GC G1 to switch to it with the right parameter > in 3.2 release? > I've commited some changes and refreshed some old links and code. If anybody masters G1 , let him improve tuning. I didn't test on windows so if somebody can test everything is ok. > > Thank > Antonio > > 2017-01-16 10:13 GMT+01:00 Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi Philippe, > > > > Thanks to your job > > > > 2017-01-15 23:20 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com > >: > > > >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > >> philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Felix Schumacher < > >> > felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Am 12.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: > >> >> > >> >>> Hello, > >> >>> What do you think of releasing a 3.2 version ? > >> >>> > >> >> I think I said before, that I would like to release often :) > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> I see following reasons: > >> >>> > >> >>> - There is a regression (See bug 60575) > >> >>> > >> >> My fix for 60575 needs tests and review as it changes the contract of > >> the > >> >> method getSendParameterValuesAsPostBody. > >> >> > >> > I reviewed it , it looks ok to me. > >> > I'll double check. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> It returned true if there were no parameters (and thus none with a > >> name). > >> >> (Or if getPostBodyRaw() is true) > >> >> > >> >> After the change it returns only true when there are parameters and > >> none > >> >> of those have a name. (Or if getPostBodyRaw() is true). > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> This method is used in POST and PUT as well, but I believe the change > >> to > >> >> be correct in both places. too. > >> >> > >> >> - We have 9 enhancements and 12 Bug fixes > >> >>> - Some nice features (at least as a current user I find them > >> >>> interesting > >> >>> :-) ): > >> >>> - More space in UI and simpler look > >> >>> - Up to date Browser based on javafx > >> >>> > >> >> We might have to warn a bit more about the need for javafx (The > default > >> >> java for SUSE Leap42.2 seems to have no javafx). Without javafx > JMeter > >> will > >> >> start, but the results tree view is missing. > >> >> > >> > > >> > I think in this case we should try to fail in a bit cleaner way > >> > > >> > >> Done through bug 60583 > >> Still, not fully satisfied with solution as we catch a > >> NoClassDefFoundError > >> (I'll send a mail on this) > >> > >> > >> > >> - Or in response assertion > >> >>> - Replace feature (partial)+ counting > >> >>> > >> >>> Maybe we can integrate before next release: > >> >>> > >> >>> - PR-247 > >> >>> > >> >> > >> If somebody can take it into account. I'm pausing for now. > >> > >> > >> > >> > - PR-246 > >> >>> > >> >> Done with some changes. > >> We can improve in the future by: > >> > >> - Using HttpComponents HttpAsyncClient > >> - Make some properties configurable > >> > >> > >> - PR-245 > >> >>> > >> >> Done with some changes > >> > >> > - PR-237 > >> >>> > >> >> Done > >> > >> > > >> >>> And upgrade some dependencies: > >> >>> > >> >>> - jodd which has a lot of perf enhancements that we use in > JMeter > >> >>> (for > >> >>> resources extractions) > >> >>> - httpcomponents > >> >>> - maybe more > >> >>> > >> >> Done > >> > >> I'd also like to commit : > >> > >> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60514 > >> > >> > >> I would like to link the converted pdf tutorials and maybe do a bit of > >> >> minor tweaks to the look and feel of the web pages (less shadows). > >> >> > >> >> Should the sect-num number of the tutorials be continued from those > in > >> >> the usermanual section? > >> >> > >> > > >> > I think so. > >> > > >> > > >> >>> Besides, we did a lot of code changes related to sonar, let's > release > >> it. > >> >>> > >> >>> A last good thing is that we start to release more often. > >> >>> > >> >> +1 > >> >> > >> >> Felix > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Cordialement. > >> > Philippe Mouawad. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cordialement. > >> Philippe Mouawad. > >> > > > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
