About G1, do you have a test case to check it and try to improve tuning? Antonio
2017-01-16 22:31 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > One more thing > > > > Release 3.2 will need Java 8. Is it the moment to switch to Nashorn > Engine > > by default? > > > +1 for me but we need to make it clear wherever Javascript is used: > > - IfController > - __javascript function > - properties reference > - jmeter.properties > - changes.xml as Incompatible change > > > > > Someone have made test with GC G1 to switch to it with the right > parameter > > in 3.2 release? > > > I've commited some changes and refreshed some old links and code. > If anybody masters G1 , let him improve tuning. > > I didn't test on windows so if somebody can test everything is ok. > > > > > > Thank > > Antonio > > > > 2017-01-16 10:13 GMT+01:00 Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hi Philippe, > > > > > > Thanks to your job > > > > > > 2017-01-15 23:20 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad < > [email protected] > > >: > > > > > >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Felix Schumacher < > > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> Am 12.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: > > >> >> > > >> >>> Hello, > > >> >>> What do you think of releasing a 3.2 version ? > > >> >>> > > >> >> I think I said before, that I would like to release often :) > > >> >> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> I see following reasons: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> - There is a regression (See bug 60575) > > >> >>> > > >> >> My fix for 60575 needs tests and review as it changes the contract > of > > >> the > > >> >> method getSendParameterValuesAsPostBody. > > >> >> > > >> > I reviewed it , it looks ok to me. > > >> > I'll double check. > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> It returned true if there were no parameters (and thus none with a > > >> name). > > >> >> (Or if getPostBodyRaw() is true) > > >> >> > > >> >> After the change it returns only true when there are parameters and > > >> none > > >> >> of those have a name. (Or if getPostBodyRaw() is true). > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> This method is used in POST and PUT as well, but I believe the > change > > >> to > > >> >> be correct in both places. too. > > >> >> > > >> >> - We have 9 enhancements and 12 Bug fixes > > >> >>> - Some nice features (at least as a current user I find them > > >> >>> interesting > > >> >>> :-) ): > > >> >>> - More space in UI and simpler look > > >> >>> - Up to date Browser based on javafx > > >> >>> > > >> >> We might have to warn a bit more about the need for javafx (The > > default > > >> >> java for SUSE Leap42.2 seems to have no javafx). Without javafx > > JMeter > > >> will > > >> >> start, but the results tree view is missing. > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > I think in this case we should try to fail in a bit cleaner way > > >> > > > >> > > >> Done through bug 60583 > > >> Still, not fully satisfied with solution as we catch a > > >> NoClassDefFoundError > > >> (I'll send a mail on this) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> - Or in response assertion > > >> >>> - Replace feature (partial)+ counting > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Maybe we can integrate before next release: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> - PR-247 > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> If somebody can take it into account. I'm pausing for now. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > - PR-246 > > >> >>> > > >> >> Done with some changes. > > >> We can improve in the future by: > > >> > > >> - Using HttpComponents HttpAsyncClient > > >> - Make some properties configurable > > >> > > >> > > >> - PR-245 > > >> >>> > > >> >> Done with some changes > > >> > > >> > - PR-237 > > >> >>> > > >> >> Done > > >> > > >> > > > >> >>> And upgrade some dependencies: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> - jodd which has a lot of perf enhancements that we use in > > JMeter > > >> >>> (for > > >> >>> resources extractions) > > >> >>> - httpcomponents > > >> >>> - maybe more > > >> >>> > > >> >> Done > > >> > > >> I'd also like to commit : > > >> > > >> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60514 > > >> > > >> > > >> I would like to link the converted pdf tutorials and maybe do a bit > of > > >> >> minor tweaks to the look and feel of the web pages (less shadows). > > >> >> > > >> >> Should the sect-num number of the tutorials be continued from those > > in > > >> >> the usermanual section? > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > I think so. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >>> Besides, we did a lot of code changes related to sonar, let's > > release > > >> it. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> A last good thing is that we start to release more often. > > >> >>> > > >> >> +1 > > >> >> > > >> >> Felix > > >> >> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Cordialement. > > >> > Philippe Mouawad. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Cordialement. > > >> Philippe Mouawad. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. >
