FYI you do not need to break master build increasing checkstyle nor adding "record" for tests only (which breaks some IDE) because you can reproduce it with a @JohnzonRecord
Guess we either have to drop java 17 for test classes or upgrade checkstyele now master is broken Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog <https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064> Le mer. 2 juil. 2025 à 19:27, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a écrit : > There it is > > https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/132 > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 5:32 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > wrote: > > > One more thing > > > > I'd like to change the visibility of the Default visibility of Johnson. > So > > we can inherit from it instead of starting from scratch > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > Le mer. 2 juil. 2025, 12:50, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > > a écrit : > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Anyone against bumping the java version for the main branch from 11 to > 14 > >> (or even 17)? > >> Currently, Java Record aren't really well managed and I don't think > using > >> Java Reflection to workaround the Java version is the best design. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > > >
