Did I push to master?

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 10:01 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> FYI you do not need to break master build increasing checkstyle nor adding
> "record" for tests only (which breaks some IDE) because you can reproduce
> it with a @JohnzonRecord
>
> Guess we either have to drop java 17 for test classes or upgrade
> checkstyele now master is broken
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog
> <https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/>
> | Old
> Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064
> >
>
>
> Le mer. 2 juil. 2025 à 19:27, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> a écrit :
>
> > There it is
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/132
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 5:32 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > One more thing
> > >
> > > I'd like to change the visibility of the Default visibility of Johnson.
> > So
> > > we can inherit from it instead of starting from scratch
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> > > Le mer. 2 juil. 2025, 12:50, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> > > a écrit :
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Anyone against bumping the java version for the main branch from 11 to
> > 14
> > >> (or even 17)?
> > >> Currently, Java Record aren't really well managed and I don't think
> > using
> > >> Java Reflection to workaround the Java version is the best design.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to