Martin Krauskopf wrote:
I'm not sure how the rubyforge behaves in such a case when two gems with the same name are offered by the two projects. Probably just offers list of them. In such a case it would be ok since gem tool will offer something like:

 1. ruby-debug-base 0.9.3 (ruby)
 2. ruby-debug-base 0.9.3 (mswin32)
 3. ruby-debug-base 0.9.3 (java)

I think. And since now it's up to the user. So I would say yes, let's go. We always can delete the released file in case of some problems. And probably most of the users do not share gem repository anyway as others said.

I'm not certain it works this way. Sync up with the ruby-debug maintainer and see if we can just get it released as part of their normal process, and otherwise *confirm first* that us releasing a ruby-debug gem of the same general name will not break the existing released versions.

- Charlie

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to