Martin Krauskopf wrote:
Peter Brant wrote:
On 10/31/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps we should just leave it as a gem to be installed by the user
(through gem support in NB if necessary) and get it released the right
I think that's probably just as well. Haste makes waste and all that.
It would be nice if we could release the gem (and more importantly the
subsequent bug fixes we'll almost certainly have once jruby-debug gets
more testing) without the help of the ruby-debug guys, but if not, so
be it.
This is very good point. ruby-debug guys did not release for
relatively long time. And we can expect that we will need to release
very often in the beginning.
It should not be a big problem to put into the ruby-debug-[cli|ide]
some code like:
if PLATFORM == 'java'
require 'jruby-debug-base'
else
require 'ruby-debug-base'
end
Please don't use PLATFORM == 'java'
The best way to check for JRuby-ness is
defined?(JRUBY_VERSION)
Cheers
--
Ola Bini (http://ola-bini.blogspot.com)
JRuby Core Developer
Developer, ThoughtWorks Studios (http://studios.thoughtworks.com)
Practical JRuby on Rails (http://apress.com/book/view/9781590598818)
"Yields falsehood when quined" yields falsehood when quined.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
