On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Sergio (serabe) suggested adding ByteList as a submodule in Git. It
> seems like a good idea; we could keep them separate repositories, but
> still have the source available for debugging. I'm no expert on
> submodules, though, so I'm not sure the right way to structure it.
>
> I've attached a format-patch that adds four submodules for bytelist,
> joni, jcodings, and jruby-openssl, the primary set of libraries that
> we maintain separately and which are generally necessary for most
> users. Let me know what you all think...
I like this for bytelist, joni, and jcodings since we bundle those and
I frequently want to see the source when debugging. But I'm not sure
about jruby-openssl. It's small though and doesn't hurt too much, I
suppose. Any lingering security implications with forcing a
bouncycastle download when people clone the git repo?
/Nick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
