Yes, I don't see any need to release the same 2.9.1 product just without
"incubator" in its version name, that's not a very Apache-esque way of
doing things (the "incubator" in version release is not an indicator of
software quality, as Apache stresses over and over.) If none of us
right now have time to work on JSPWiki (a situation I hope changes soon
with me), busywork such as that isn't going to help the situation.
Glen
On 11/08/2013 01:02 PM, Harry Metske wrote:
what would be reasons to release 2.9.x versus 2.10.x ?
The latter has more issues fixed...
regards,
Harry
On 8 November 2013 08:41, Jürgen Weber <[email protected]> wrote:
+1
Am 07.11.2013 19:33 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
[email protected]>:
+1 too
In order to remain 2.9.x, we should get back o.a.w.WikiException (deleted
in favour of o.a.w.api.WikiException) and maybe one or two similar
changes,
have to check svn to be sure.. Otherwise we should release 2.10.0
I'm thinking we could also use this release to publish the release on
ASF's
maven repo, so we also end up on central. WDYT?
br,
juan pablo
El 05/11/2013 17:07, "Harry Metske" <[email protected]> escribió:
+1
On 5 November 2013 16:50, Jürgen Weber <[email protected]> wrote:
Currently the dev mailing list is a bit lonely, there seems not a lot
be
going on.
I suggest that JSPWiki 2.9.1 come out from incubator.
Actually 2.9.1 looks good. Why not release it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often
Cheers,
Juergen
