Hi folks,
IMHO it is important to get the release out
* users are looking at project activity - there are many different wikis
out there ...
* are there bugfixes in 2.9.1 the users would appreciate? Better have a
small bugfix release now than the latest and greatest release 9 months
down the road (which might get delayed later on)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 10.11.13 21:39, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
Hi,
about 2.9 vs 2.10, I was having in mind releasing trunk in any case, the
version numbers were just to note binary compatibility. If we release
current trunk as it is, it isn't binary compatible with latest release,
because of 2.10.0-svn-8 and 2.10.0-svn-26. We could copy those classes back
to their original location and have 2.9.2 (with some duplicated classes) or
just release 2.10.0 as it is. I'm a little inclined to 2.9.2, because I was
having in mind further similar refactorings with the rest of the managers
for 2.10, but given the fact I've been unable to spend time coding these
last months, 2.10 would also be fine for me.
As an aside, there's an initial Infra setup [#1] to allow us to deploy to
repository.apache.org, which is synced with central. Once that is done,
I'll update the appropiate page on jspwiki.a.o
br,
juan pablo
[#1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6986
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I don't see any need to release the same 2.9.1 product just without
"incubator" in its version name, that's not a very Apache-esque way of
doing things (the "incubator" in version release is not an indicator of
software quality, as Apache stresses over and over.) If none of us right
now have time to work on JSPWiki (a situation I hope changes soon with me),
busywork such as that isn't going to help the situation.
Glen
On 11/08/2013 01:02 PM, Harry Metske wrote:
what would be reasons to release 2.9.x versus 2.10.x ?
The latter has more issues fixed...
regards,
Harry
On 8 November 2013 08:41, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote:
+1
Am 07.11.2013 19:33 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" <
juanpablo.san...@gmail.com>:
+1 too
In order to remain 2.9.x, we should get back o.a.w.WikiException
(deleted
in favour of o.a.w.api.WikiException) and maybe one or two similar
changes,
have to check svn to be sure.. Otherwise we should release 2.10.0
I'm thinking we could also use this release to publish the release on
ASF's
maven repo, so we also end up on central. WDYT?
br,
juan pablo
El 05/11/2013 17:07, "Harry Metske" <harry.met...@gmail.com> escribió:
+1
On 5 November 2013 16:50, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote:
Currently the dev mailing list is a bit lonely, there seems not a lot
be
going on.
I suggest that JSPWiki 2.9.1 come out from incubator.
Actually 2.9.1 looks good. Why not release it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often
Cheers,
Juergen
