Hi Juan Pablo, I will play around with the current trunk :-)
Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl On 16 Dec 2013, at 22:03, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > just finished doing a big bunch of pending refactors prior to releasing > 2.10. We should be able to end up with all the artifacts on maven central > too (once the vote+release passes), and use a staged repository[#1] to vote > instead of uploading to somewhere at people.a.o > > There are only a couple of points remaining: updating UPGRADING and > ReleaseNotes and ensuring all the prerequisites of [#1] are met. Hopefully, > they will be done between today and tomorrow. In the meantime, this is a > call for testing current trunk, which is going to be most likely 2.10.0. > I've tried to test all the recent commits (and will continue to do some > more testing), but for sure the more people looking into it before voting > the release, the better. > > > thanks + br, > juan pablo > > > [#1]: > http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#staging-maven > > > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Siegfried Goeschl < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> IMHO it is important to get the release out >> >> * users are looking at project activity - there are many different wikis >> out there ... >> >> * are there bugfixes in 2.9.1 the users would appreciate? Better have a >> small bugfix release now than the latest and greatest release 9 months down >> the road (which might get delayed later on) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Siegfried Goeschl >> >> >> >> >> On 10.11.13 21:39, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> about 2.9 vs 2.10, I was having in mind releasing trunk in any case, the >>> version numbers were just to note binary compatibility. If we release >>> current trunk as it is, it isn't binary compatible with latest release, >>> because of 2.10.0-svn-8 and 2.10.0-svn-26. We could copy those classes >>> back >>> to their original location and have 2.9.2 (with some duplicated classes) >>> or >>> just release 2.10.0 as it is. I'm a little inclined to 2.9.2, because I >>> was >>> having in mind further similar refactorings with the rest of the managers >>> for 2.10, but given the fact I've been unable to spend time coding these >>> last months, 2.10 would also be fine for me. >>> >>> As an aside, there's an initial Infra setup [#1] to allow us to deploy to >>> repository.apache.org, which is synced with central. Once that is done, >>> I'll update the appropiate page on jspwiki.a.o >>> >>> >>> br, >>> juan pablo >>> >>> [#1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6986 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, I don't see any need to release the same 2.9.1 product just without >>>> "incubator" in its version name, that's not a very Apache-esque way of >>>> doing things (the "incubator" in version release is not an indicator of >>>> software quality, as Apache stresses over and over.) If none of us >>>> right >>>> now have time to work on JSPWiki (a situation I hope changes soon with >>>> me), >>>> busywork such as that isn't going to help the situation. >>>> >>>> Glen >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/08/2013 01:02 PM, Harry Metske wrote: >>>> >>>> what would be reasons to release 2.9.x versus 2.10.x ? >>>>> The latter has more issues fixed... >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> Harry >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 8 November 2013 08:41, Jürgen Weber <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>>> Am 07.11.2013 19:33 schrieb "Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez" < >>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 too >>>>>> >>>>>>> In order to remain 2.9.x, we should get back o.a.w.WikiException >>>>>>> (deleted >>>>>>> in favour of o.a.w.api.WikiException) and maybe one or two similar >>>>>>> >>>>>>> changes, >>>>>> >>>>>> have to check svn to be sure.. Otherwise we should release 2.10.0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm thinking we could also use this release to publish the release on >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ASF's >>>>>> >>>>>> maven repo, so we also end up on central. WDYT? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> br, >>>>>>> juan pablo >>>>>>> El 05/11/2013 17:07, "Harry Metske" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5 November 2013 16:50, Jürgen Weber <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently the dev mailing list is a bit lonely, there seems not a >>>>>>>> lot >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> going on. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I suggest that JSPWiki 2.9.1 come out from incubator. >>>>>>>>> Actually 2.9.1 looks good. Why not release it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Juergen >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>
