[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13493266#comment-13493266
 ] 

Kurt T Stam commented on JUDDI-549:
-----------------------------------

Thanks Jess, looks good. before I commit:

1. would it make sense to collapse X509Certificate, X509SKI, X509CRL, 
X509IssuerSerial and X509SubjectName down to one class and to add a type? 
2. do you have code that I can add to a unittest to do a signing, and 
verification (I understand this is all on the clientside, but it'd be nice to 
show how it is supposed to be used)?
3. is the functionality in this patch such that it covers your needs around 
this signing/verification? If we collapse down to one class would it be easier 
to add support for other signature type besides X509 at a later time? What 
other types might we want to support at a later time?

thx!

--Kurt
                
> Support Digital Signatures
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: JUDDI-549
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-549
>             Project: jUDDI
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: feature requests
>            Reporter: Jesse Sightler
>            Assignee: Kurt T Stam
>              Labels: security
>             Fix For: 3.2
>
>         Attachments: juddi_549_patch_2012110514.diff, 
> juddi_549_patch_2012110612.diff
>
>
> Support UDDI v3 digital signature standard:
> http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi-v3.0.2-20041019.htm#_Toc85908445

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to