[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13493389#comment-13493389
]
Jesse Sightler commented on JUDDI-549:
--------------------------------------
1. Yes, I think that makes a lot of sense. I could actually see all of that
collapsing into just the X509Certificate class.
2. I'll see what I can come up with for this.
3. Yes, this covers our needs. I agree that collapsing it down would make
adding others easier. I don't know that any of the others would be likely to be
used, as this seems to cover the typical X509 case.
I'll submit an updated patch for the test later today. Should I go ahead and
collapse those classes down as well?
> Support Digital Signatures
> --------------------------
>
> Key: JUDDI-549
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-549
> Project: jUDDI
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: feature requests
> Reporter: Jesse Sightler
> Assignee: Kurt T Stam
> Labels: security
> Fix For: 3.2
>
> Attachments: juddi_549_patch_2012110514.diff,
> juddi_549_patch_2012110612.diff
>
>
> Support UDDI v3 digital signature standard:
> http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi-v3.0.2-20041019.htm#_Toc85908445
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
