+1 for mvn site.

—Kurt

> On Feb 9, 2018, at 9:14 AM, Alex O'Ree <alexo...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> A while ago, we switched from a maven based site to the Apache CMS based 
> site. There are some pros and cons of this setup.
> 
> Pros (for using CMS over mvn site)
> - Site can be updated at any point in time, independent of maven builds
> - Builds are usually very quick and do not require
> 
> Cons
> - Source control is not in the main repository. As a committer, i need to 
> have 5 repos checked out pretty much all the time.
> 
> So I'm proposing that we which back to a maven based site. I've already done 
> the work and the source is up to date with what is currently on 
> juddi.apache.org <http://juddi.apache.org/>. There will be some minor 
> formatting differences but for the most part the change is minimal. Assuming 
> the vote passes, I'll open a infra ticket to start the switch
> 
> To prevent the site, simple check out our git repo, then use `mvn site`. 
> Standard voting rules apply.
> 
> +1 i'm obviously for it

Reply via email to