ahh forgot about this, let's just call this passed. i'll open a ticket On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Steve Viens <svi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for mvn > > Steve > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 9, 2018, at 10:00 AM, Kurt Stam <kurt.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for mvn site. > > —Kurt > > On Feb 9, 2018, at 9:14 AM, Alex O'Ree <alexo...@apache.org> wrote: > > A while ago, we switched from a maven based site to the Apache CMS based > site. There are some pros and cons of this setup. > > Pros (for using CMS over mvn site) > - Site can be updated at any point in time, independent of maven builds > - Builds are usually very quick and do not require > > Cons > - Source control is not in the main repository. As a committer, i need to > have 5 repos checked out pretty much all the time. > > So I'm proposing that we which back to a maven based site. I've already > done the work and the source is up to date with what is currently on > juddi.apache.org. There will be some minor formatting differences but for > the most part the change is minimal. Assuming the vote passes, I'll open a > infra ticket to start the switch > > To prevent the site, simple check out our git repo, then use `mvn site`. > Standard voting rules apply. > > +1 i'm obviously for it > > >
