hi Jason Thanks for your response. "transmit" is good to me.
As we discussed by email, KIP-706 is going to be merged to KIP-691(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/PSfZCQ). Hence, please feel free to replace "produce" by "transmit" in KIP-691. Best, Chia-Ping On 2021/01/30 00:48:38, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: > Hi Chia-Ping, > > I think this is a great idea. It is a pity that we cannot continue to use > the `send` verb, but I don't see how we can. I know we considered > `transmit` as another option which is closer to `send`. That would avoid > the redundancy when people choose the common "producer" variable name. > > producer.transmit > > instead of > > producer.produce > > A couple alternatives might be `write` or `append`. I'm happy with > `produce` as well, but curious if others have thoughts. > > -Jason > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:37 AM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > I'd like to start the discussion thread for KIP-706: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=100829459 > > > > KIP-706 is proposing to introduce new API "CompletionStage > > produce(record)" to Producer. Kafka users can leverage CompletionStage to > > write asynchronous non-blocking code. CompletionStage is more powerful than > > Future and callback. Also, the code using Future and callback can be easily > > re-written by CompletionStage. > > > > Cheers, > > Chia-Ping > > > > >
