Are we saying that we won't pursue this KIP in favor of the other one? Ismael
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021, 4:15 AM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> wrote: > hi Jason > > Thanks for your response. "transmit" is good to me. > > As we discussed by email, KIP-706 is going to be merged to KIP-691( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/PSfZCQ). Hence, please feel free to > replace "produce" by "transmit" in KIP-691. > > Best, > Chia-Ping > > On 2021/01/30 00:48:38, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: > > Hi Chia-Ping, > > > > I think this is a great idea. It is a pity that we cannot continue to use > > the `send` verb, but I don't see how we can. I know we considered > > `transmit` as another option which is closer to `send`. That would avoid > > the redundancy when people choose the common "producer" variable name. > > > > producer.transmit > > > > instead of > > > > producer.produce > > > > A couple alternatives might be `write` or `append`. I'm happy with > > `produce` as well, but curious if others have thoughts. > > > > -Jason > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:37 AM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I'd like to start the discussion thread for KIP-706: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=100829459 > > > > > > KIP-706 is proposing to introduce new API "CompletionStage > > > produce(record)" to Producer. Kafka users can leverage CompletionStage > to > > > write asynchronous non-blocking code. CompletionStage is more powerful > than > > > Future and callback. Also, the code using Future and callback can be > easily > > > re-written by CompletionStage. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Chia-Ping > > > > > > > > >
