For the sake of having another option to shoot down, we could take a page from the .net client and separate the message data from the destination (i.e. topic or partition). This would get around the need to use a new verb. For example:
CompletionStage<RecordMetadata> send(String topic, Message message); CompletionStage<RecordMetadata> send(TopicPartition topicPartition, Message message); -Jason On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:30 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: > I think this still makes sense as a separate KIP. For KIP-691, we are just > looking to help define the error contract for the new API. > > -Jason > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 8:39 AM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > >> Are we saying that we won't pursue this KIP in favor of the other one? >> >> Ismael >> >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021, 4:15 AM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > hi Jason >> > >> > Thanks for your response. "transmit" is good to me. >> > >> > As we discussed by email, KIP-706 is going to be merged to KIP-691( >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/PSfZCQ). Hence, please feel free >> to >> > replace "produce" by "transmit" in KIP-691. >> > >> > Best, >> > Chia-Ping >> > >> > On 2021/01/30 00:48:38, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: >> > > Hi Chia-Ping, >> > > >> > > I think this is a great idea. It is a pity that we cannot continue to >> use >> > > the `send` verb, but I don't see how we can. I know we considered >> > > `transmit` as another option which is closer to `send`. That would >> avoid >> > > the redundancy when people choose the common "producer" variable name. >> > > >> > > producer.transmit >> > > >> > > instead of >> > > >> > > producer.produce >> > > >> > > A couple alternatives might be `write` or `append`. I'm happy with >> > > `produce` as well, but curious if others have thoughts. >> > > >> > > -Jason >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:37 AM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Dear all, >> > > > >> > > > I'd like to start the discussion thread for KIP-706: >> > > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=100829459 >> > > > >> > > > KIP-706 is proposing to introduce new API "CompletionStage >> > > > produce(record)" to Producer. Kafka users can leverage >> CompletionStage >> > to >> > > > write asynchronous non-blocking code. CompletionStage is more >> powerful >> > than >> > > > Future and callback. Also, the code using Future and callback can be >> > easily >> > > > re-written by CompletionStage. >> > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > Chia-Ping >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
