Thanks for the KIP. I read it and I am also worried by the complexity of the new configurations. They are not easy to grasp. I need to digest it a bit more, I think.
Best, David Le mer. 29 juin 2022 à 02:25, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> a écrit : > Thanks for the KIP. > > I don't think I fully digested the proposal yet, but my first reaction > is: this is quite complicated. Frankly, I am worried about complexity > and usability. > > Especially the option `safe_latest` is a "weird" one IMHO, and `nearest` > is even more complex. > > The problem at hand (as I understand it from the Jira) is a real one, > but I am wondering if it would be something that should be addressed by > the application? If you pass in strategy `none`, and a new partition is > added, you can react to it by custom code. For regular startup you can > still go with "latest" to avoid reprocessing the history. > > Adding "latest/earliest_on_start" seems useful, as it seems to also > address https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3370 > > > -Matthias > > > On 6/7/22 12:55 AM, hudeqi wrote: > > I think so too, what about Guozhang Wang and Luke Chen? Can I initiate a > voting process? > > > > Best, > > hudeqi > > > > > -----原始邮件----- > > > 发件人: "邓子明" <dengzim...@growingio.com> > > > 发送时间: 2022-06-07 10:23:37 (星期二) > > > 收件人: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > 抄送: > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-842: Add richer group offset reset mechanisms > > > > > </dengzim...@growingio.com> >
