Hi Josep, Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding).
One small nit: I don't think we necessarily have to hold ourselves to releasing 4.0.0 "3 to 4 months after 3.8 branch is created" (quoting the timeline section of the KIP). IMO it's fine to leave some wiggle room for the 4.0.0 release without codifying a timeline in this KIP. Maybe something like "some time after 3.8 branch is created" would be sufficient? Anyways, not a huge thing, I'm sure we'll all give 4.0.0 the flexibility it needs with the understanding that this KIP is more focused on 3.8.0 than 4.0.0. Cheers, Chris On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 11:41 AM Greg Harris <greg.har...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: > Thanks Josep for leading the KIP and building consensus on 3.8! > > +1 (binding) > > Greg > > On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 11:45 PM Josep Prat <josep.p...@aiven.io.invalid> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Thanks for your comments, > > I reworded some parts of the KIP to express that: > > - The KIP is to agree that we need at least one more minor version in the > > 3.x series > > - Explicitly saying that the list of KIPs is not exhaustive and that if > > some are not done, we would need another minor version > > - Which are the KIPs/Features the community identified that should be > > present in a 3.x version so they can safely migrate to a potential 4.0 > > version > > - The timeline of 4.0 (starting after branching, not after release) > > - Wording is now focusing more on the need to have at least another minor > > release in 3.x to enable and ease migration to a potential 4.0 version > > > > I always mention potential in terms of 4.0 as we don't know what will be > in > > there yet, and this KIP's scope is not meant to define this. > > > > Best, > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 10:46 PM Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> wrote: > > > > > I agree with Colin. Also, 4.0 would be started after 3.8 is branched > (not > > > after 3.8.0 is released). The rest looks good. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:27 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Thanks for calling the vote, Josep. > > > > > > > > I re-checked this, and saw something that we missed updating. One > thing > > > we > > > > talked about earlier is that KIP-966 is actually not required for > 3.8. > > > What > > > > is required is some way of enabling unclean leader election by > default in > > > > KRaft. (Which could be KIP-966, or something else). Please revise > this. > > > > > > > > best, > > > > Colin > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, at 02:50, Anton Agestam wrote: > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > > > > > > > Den fre 5 jan. 2024 kl 10:33 skrev Josep Prat > > > > <josep.p...@aiven.io.invalid>: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi all, > > > > >> > > > > >> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-1012: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1012%3A+The+need+for+a+Kafka+3.8.x+release > > > > >> > > > > >> Discussion thread is here: > > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/kvdp2gmq5gd9txkvxh5vk3z2n55b04s5 > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > >> > > > > >> --- > > > > >> Josep Prat > > > > >> Open Source Engineering Director, aivenjosep.p...@aiven.io | > > > > >> +491715557497 | aiven.io > > > > >> Aiven Deutschland GmbH > > > > >> Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin > > > > >> Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen > > > > >> Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > [image: Aiven] <https://www.aiven.io> > > > > *Josep Prat* > > Open Source Engineering Director, *Aiven* > > josep.p...@aiven.io | +491715557497 > > aiven.io <https://www.aiven.io> | < > https://www.facebook.com/aivencloud> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/aiven/> < > https://twitter.com/aiven_io> > > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH* > > Alexanderufer 3-7, 10117 Berlin > > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen > > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B >
