+1 on 0.9 as well.

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Aditya Auradkar <
aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:

> +1 on 0.9
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Edward Ribeiro <edward.ribe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 on 0.9.0
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on 0.9.0
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I propose a simple rename: s/0.8.3/0.9.0/
> > > >
> > > > No change of scope and not including current 0.9.0 issues.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
> > > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Is the plan to release 0.9 in October with the features currently
> > > > targeted
> > > > > for 0.8.3, or would 0.9 be a later release including all the issues
> > > > > currently targeted for 0.8.3 and 0.9? Will the scope of the release
> > > > change
> > > > > when it is renamed?
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Rajini
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 on 0.9
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Jay
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Kafka Fans,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do you think of making the next release (the one with
> > > security,
> > > > > new
> > > > > > > consumer, quotas, etc) a 0.9.0 instead of 0.8.3?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It has lots of new features, and new consumer was pretty much
> > > scoped
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > 0.9.0, so it matches our original roadmap. I feel that so many
> > > > awesome
> > > > > > > features deserve a better release number.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The downside is mainly some confusion (we refer to 0.8.3 in
> bunch
> > > of
> > > > > > > places), and noisy emails from JIRA while we change "fix
> version"
> > > > field
> > > > > > > everywhere.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ashish
> > >
> >
>



-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to