+1 on 0.9 - we may want to adjust our ApiVersions accordingly (i.e.,
0.8.3 -> 0.9.0)


On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on 0.9 as well.
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Aditya Auradkar <
> aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> +1 on 0.9
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Edward Ribeiro <edward.ribe...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 on 0.9.0
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 on 0.9.0
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I propose a simple rename: s/0.8.3/0.9.0/
>> > > >
>> > > > No change of scope and not including current 0.9.0 issues.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
>> > > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Is the plan to release 0.9 in October with the features currently
>> > > > targeted
>> > > > > for 0.8.3, or would 0.9 be a later release including all the issues
>> > > > > currently targeted for 0.8.3 and 0.9? Will the scope of the release
>> > > > change
>> > > > > when it is renamed?
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Rajini
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 on 0.9
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > -Jay
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Kafka Fans,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > What do you think of making the next release (the one with
>> > > security,
>> > > > > new
>> > > > > > > consumer, quotas, etc) a 0.9.0 instead of 0.8.3?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > It has lots of new features, and new consumer was pretty much
>> > > scoped
>> > > > > for
>> > > > > > > 0.9.0, so it matches our original roadmap. I feel that so many
>> > > > awesome
>> > > > > > > features deserve a better release number.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The downside is mainly some confusion (we refer to 0.8.3 in
>> bunch
>> > > of
>> > > > > > > places), and noisy emails from JIRA while we change "fix
>> version"
>> > > > field
>> > > > > > > everywhere.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thoughts?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Ashish
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang

Reply via email to