This is a nice KIP write-up. LGTM too. Guozhang
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Dana Powers <dana.pow...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a nice change. Great KIP write up. > > -Dana > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Vahid S Hashemian > <vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > Thanks Ismael. > > > > What do you think is the best way to check with Storm / Spark users? > Their > > mailing list? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > --Vahid > > > > > > > > > > From: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > Date: 07/22/2016 01:44 AM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-70: Revise Partition Assignment > > Semantics on New Consumer's Subscription Change > > Sent by: isma...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP Vahid. The change makes sense. On the compatibility > > front, could we check some of the advanced Kafka users like Storm and > > Spark > > in order to verify if they would be affected? > > > > Ismael > > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Vahid S Hashemian < > > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We have started a new KIP under > >> > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-70%3A+Revise+Partition+Assignment+Semantics+on+New+Consumer%27s+Subscription+Change > > > >> > >> Your feedback is much appreciated. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Vahid Hashemian > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -- -- Guozhang
