Sounds good Vahid, thanks for doing this. :) Ismael
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Vahid S Hashemian < vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Ismael, > > I sent a message to user mailing lists of Spark and Storm a couple of days > ago and have received one response so far. > Thread on Spark mailing list: > https://www.mail-archive.com/user@spark.apache.org/msg54309.html > Thread on Storm mailing list: > https://www.mail-archive.com/user@storm.apache.org/msg06850.html > > Regards, > --Vahid > > > > From: Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > Date: 07/22/2016 01:44 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-70: Revise Partition Assignment > Semantics on New Consumer's Subscription Change > Sent by: isma...@gmail.com > > > > Thanks for the KIP Vahid. The change makes sense. On the compatibility > front, could we check some of the advanced Kafka users like Storm and > Spark > in order to verify if they would be affected? > > Ismael > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Vahid S Hashemian < > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We have started a new KIP under > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-70%3A+Revise+Partition+Assignment+Semantics+on+New+Consumer%27s+Subscription+Change > > > > > Your feedback is much appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > Vahid Hashemian > > > > > > > > >
