Thanks everyone for reviewing and voting!

I'm marking this KIP as accepted.
There were 4 binding votes from Colin, Gwen, David and Bill, and 3
non-binding votes from Stanislav, M, and Mickael.
There were no +0 or -1 votes.

Thanks again,
Justine

On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 9:10 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the KIP, looks like a great addition.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Bill
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 5:55 AM Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:23 AM David Arthur <davidart...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 binding, looks like a nice improvement. Thanks!
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:17 PM Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I wanted to let you all know the KIP has been updated. The
> > > > ComputedPartition class has been removed in favor of simply returning
> > an
> > > > integer to represent the record's partition.
> > > > In short, the implications of this change mean that keyed records
> will
> > also
> > > > trigger a change in the sticky partition. This was done for a case in
> > which
> > > > there may be keyed and non-keyed records.
> > > > Upon testing, this did not significantly change the latency for
> records
> > > > with keyed values.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Justine
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:07 AM M. Manna <manme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1(na)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 at 22:17, Stanislav Kozlovski <
> > > > stanis...@confluent.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 6:02 PM Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for the KIP. This was long awaited.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:15 PM Justine Olshan <
> > jols...@confluent.io>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'd like to start the vote for KIP-480 : Sticky Partitioner.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-480%3A+Sticky+Partitioner
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > > > > Justine Olshan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Gwen Shapira
> > > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > > > > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Stanislav
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to