AFAIK downstream projects (ServiceMix and Geronimo) are both on 2.1.x branch so that should be ok.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:56, Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we can wait a month. > We don't have that many new features to release that we can't wait a month. > > Unless the downstream projects requires the oposite, I'd say we wait. > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just started a discussion on the aries dev list for a release, and >> given aries will graduate in december, they'd like to wait for that to >> do a full 1.0 release in january... >> Do we want to wait for that ? >> >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 18:27, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Since our 2.1.0 release in September we have produced two patch >> > releases along the 2.1.x branch. I believe it is now time to switch >> > focus on preparing things for an up coming 2.2.0 release :) >> > >> > I have already setup a Jira entry for tracking 2.2.0 issues & tasks >> > [1]. Over the next few days I and other community members will be >> > reviewing issues left in our Jira marked for 2.2.0 and other issues >> > that we think need to be included. In the mean time I would like to >> > start the discussion surrounding a target date to produce 2.2.0 and >> > subsequently create the 2.2.x maintenance branch (trunk becoming 2.3 >> > snapshot line for new features, etc)? >> > >> > J >> > >> > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-249 >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> > > > > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > http://iocanel.blogspot.com > > Integration Engineer @ Upstream S.A. <http://www.upstreamsystems.com> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
