+1 to wait.
On 07/12/2010 10:09, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
+1 to wait
2010/12/7 Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]>
+1 to wait.
no hurry at all ;)
On 12/06/2010 10:56 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
I think we can wait a month.
We don't have that many new features to release that we can't wait a
month.
Unless the downstream projects requires the oposite, I'd say we wait.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]>
wrote:
Just started a discussion on the aries dev list for a release, and
given aries will graduate in december, they'd like to wait for that to
do a full 1.0 release in january...
Do we want to wait for that ?
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 18:27, Jamie G.<[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi All,
Since our 2.1.0 release in September we have produced two patch
releases along the 2.1.x branch. I believe it is now time to switch
focus on preparing things for an up coming 2.2.0 release :)
I have already setup a Jira entry for tracking 2.2.0 issues& tasks
[1]. Over the next few days I and other community members will be
reviewing issues left in our Jira marked for 2.2.0 and other issues
that we think need to be included. In the mean time I would like to
start the discussion surrounding a target date to produce 2.2.0 and
subsequently create the 2.2.x maintenance branch (trunk becoming 2.3
snapshot line for new features, etc)?
J
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-249
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
--
Adrian Trenaman, Sr. Principal Solution Architect
FuseSource
Phone: +353-86-6051026
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://trenaman.blogspot.com, http://fusesource.com
Twitter: adrian_trenaman
