+1 to wait 2010/12/7 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> +1 to wait. > > no hurry at all ;) > > > On 12/06/2010 10:56 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > >> I think we can wait a month. >> We don't have that many new features to release that we can't wait a >> month. >> >> Unless the downstream projects requires the oposite, I'd say we wait. >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Just started a discussion on the aries dev list for a release, and >>> given aries will graduate in december, they'd like to wait for that to >>> do a full 1.0 release in january... >>> Do we want to wait for that ? >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 18:27, Jamie G.<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Since our 2.1.0 release in September we have produced two patch >>>> releases along the 2.1.x branch. I believe it is now time to switch >>>> focus on preparing things for an up coming 2.2.0 release :) >>>> >>>> I have already setup a Jira entry for tracking 2.2.0 issues& tasks >>>> [1]. Over the next few days I and other community members will be >>>> reviewing issues left in our Jira marked for 2.2.0 and other issues >>>> that we think need to be included. In the mean time I would like to >>>> start the discussion surrounding a target date to produce 2.2.0 and >>>> subsequently create the 2.2.x maintenance branch (trunk becoming 2.3 >>>> snapshot line for new features, etc)? >>>> >>>> J >>>> >>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-249 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Guillaume Nodet >>> ------------------------ >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> ------------------------ >>> Open Source SOA >>> http://fusesource.com >>> >>> >> >> >>
