+1, Java 1.6 on Karaf 3.x series.

2011/1/6 Łukasz Dywicki <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
> Than we agree that we may switch to JVM 1.6 after 3.0 release. I am happy to
> hear this. :)
>
> Best regards,
> Lukasz
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ioannis Canellos [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 9:50 AM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Switch to Java 1.6?
>
> +1
>
> 2011/1/6 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>
>> For the Karaf 2.x, I think that it's clear that we need to be JDK 1.5
>> compatible.
>>
>> On the other hand, for Karaf 3.x, no problem at all, +1 to be only JDK 1.6
>> compliant.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 01/04/2011 11:08 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Some time ago I created issue KARAF-328 which is sticky card about JVM
>>> version policy.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now I am a bit confused because I would like get rid XML parsing from
>>> feature service and switch it to JAXB while working on KARAF-53. I know
>>> that
>>> build is made on JVM 1.5 and this change will broke capability with older
>>> virtual machines. I wouldn't force anyone to upgrade but moving to new
> JVM
>>> version can simplify our life a bit. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that CXF, ActiveMQ and Camel works with Java 1.5. We have JRE 1.5
> and
>>> JRE 1.6 profiles in jre.properties. From my point of view it is not a
>>> problem to stay with 1.5 but if it make sense to stay with version which
>>> is
>>> supported only if you pay Oracle for? As another note - JVM 1.5 was
>>> released
>>> in May 2004 and it is 6 year old. What do you think about that?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Lukasz
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>
> Integration Engineer @ Upstream S.A. <http://www.upstreamsystems.com>
>
>

Reply via email to