TBH I'm a little bit confused by the site right now. I would prefer to finish this first and make clear where and how to update/extend the site first :)
kind regards, andreas On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:59:41AM -0330, Jamie G. wrote: > We probably need to setup a roadmap page for Karaf where we can > indicate major changes such as JVM support. > > Is this something we should tackle now or as part of the site updates? > > 2011/1/6 Jamie G. <[email protected]>: > > +1, Java 1.6 on Karaf 3.x series. > > > > 2011/1/6 Łukasz Dywicki <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, > >> Than we agree that we may switch to JVM 1.6 after 3.0 release. I am happy > >> to > >> hear this. :) > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Lukasz > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ioannis Canellos [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 9:50 AM > >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Switch to Java 1.6? > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> 2011/1/6 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > >> > >>> For the Karaf 2.x, I think that it's clear that we need to be JDK 1.5 > >>> compatible. > >>> > >>> On the other hand, for Karaf 3.x, no problem at all, +1 to be only JDK 1.6 > >>> compliant. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> JB > >>> > >>> > >>> On 01/04/2011 11:08 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> Some time ago I created issue KARAF-328 which is sticky card about JVM > >>>> version policy. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Now I am a bit confused because I would like get rid XML parsing from > >>>> feature service and switch it to JAXB while working on KARAF-53. I know > >>>> that > >>>> build is made on JVM 1.5 and this change will broke capability with older > >>>> virtual machines. I wouldn't force anyone to upgrade but moving to new > >> JVM > >>>> version can simplify our life a bit. :-) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Note that CXF, ActiveMQ and Camel works with Java 1.5. We have JRE 1.5 > >> and > >>>> JRE 1.6 profiles in jre.properties. From my point of view it is not a > >>>> problem to stay with 1.5 but if it make sense to stay with version which > >>>> is > >>>> supported only if you pay Oracle for? As another note - JVM 1.5 was > >>>> released > >>>> in May 2004 and it is 6 year old. What do you think about that? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> > >>>> Lukasz > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> *Ioannis Canellos* > >> http://iocanel.blogspot.com > >> > >> Integration Engineer @ Upstream S.A. <http://www.upstreamsystems.com> > >> > >> > >
pgp3RRn7ohP8j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
