Since there is so much new, and so good improvements with 2.2 I don't see anything speaking against it :)
> I think we've agreed that Karaf 3.x would support JDK 1.6 only. > Now, I'm wondering if we should rename 2.2 into 3.0 ;-) > Thoughts ? > > > 2011/1/4 Łukasz Dywicki <[email protected]> > >> Hi all, >> >> Some time ago I created issue KARAF-328 which is sticky card about JVM >> version policy. >> >> >> >> Now I am a bit confused because I would like get rid XML parsing from >> feature service and switch it to JAXB while working on KARAF-53. I know >> that >> build is made on JVM 1.5 and this change will broke capability with older >> virtual machines. I wouldn't force anyone to upgrade but moving to new JVM >> version can simplify our life a bit. :-) >> >> >> >> Note that CXF, ActiveMQ and Camel works with Java 1.5. We have JRE 1.5 and >> JRE 1.6 profiles in jre.properties. From my point of view it is not a >> problem to stay with 1.5 but if it make sense to stay with version which is >> supported only if you pay Oracle for? As another note - JVM 1.5 was >> released >> in May 2004 and it is 6 year old. What do you think about that? >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Lukasz >> >> >
