+1, that's exactly what I had in mind :)
2011/2/9 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: > I think we can split into three parts, regarding our latest discussions: > > Example > 1/ Latest Stable Releases: > 2.1.3 windows/unix > 2.2.0 windows/unix > > 2/ Unstable Release: > 2.99.99-SNAPSHOT windows/unix > > 3/ Previous Releases (on a separate page) > ... > ... > > Regards > JB > > On 02/09/2011 09:41 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: >> >> I agree with you on this. >> Still I think it would be nice to list a "history", >> so since this part stays in the wiki, doesn't it? >> We could add an extra sub-page with the history. >> >> wdyt? >> >> Achim >> >> 2011/2/9 Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]>: >>> >>> I think the download page will tend to grow indefinitely if we keep >>> the way it is. >>> I propose we only keep the latest maintenance release for each branch, >>> I think it makes more sense. >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Guillaume Nodet >>> ------------------------ >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> ------------------------ >>> Open Source SOA >>> http://fusesource.com >>> >
