Yeah, looks good to me too.
I'll try to work on that.  I also plan to add a link to the release
notes page for each release, as those are at the top, so it's not
really natural to me.
I also wonder if we should embed the mirrors combox box as done on the
felix download page (http://felix.apache.org/site/downloads.cgi) which
avoids the intermediate mirror selection.

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 09:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think we can split into three parts, regarding our latest discussions:
>
> Example
> 1/ Latest Stable Releases:
>        2.1.3 windows/unix
>        2.2.0 windows/unix
>
> 2/ Unstable Release:
>        2.99.99-SNAPSHOT windows/unix
>
> 3/ Previous Releases (on a separate page)
>        ...
>        ...
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/09/2011 09:41 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>>
>> I agree with you on this.
>> Still I think it would be nice to list a "history",
>> so since this part stays in the wiki, doesn't it?
>> We could add an extra sub-page with the history.
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>> Achim
>>
>> 2011/2/9 Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> I think the download page will tend to grow indefinitely if we keep
>>> the way it is.
>>> I propose we only keep the latest maintenance release for each branch,
>>> I think it makes more sense.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Reply via email to