Christian Schneider wrote: > > +1 > > I think clustering is important enough to be part of the enterprise > features. > > Christian > > Am 04.05.2011 14:01, schrieb Ioannis Canellos: >> Guys, we are getting off topic. >> >> Even though I like Guillaume's ideas about central repository etc, it is >> still hypothetical since the mechanism is not implemented yet and thus we >> can't base our decisions on that. >> >> What we currently have is standard/enterprise features descriptor. What I >> am >> saying is that clustering should be part of the enterprise features >> descriptor *(and probably hosted as subproject)*. Once we implement the >> central repository mechanism we can move it there. >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > -- > ---- > http://www.liquid-reality.de >
Subprojects sounds like a good idea on the face, but it really comes down to a management issue. Who is going to be responsible for each sub-project? Right now we have a few folks who are working on Karaf in addition to other open-source projects. IMHO, we should not have a sub-project unless we have someone willing to be responsible for it. I also don't think Jamie should be that one person for all sub-projects. However, if we can get folks to accept responsiblity for them, I think its a great idea. ----- Mike Van (aka karafman) Karaf Team (Contributor) -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899307.html Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
