Andreas Pieber wrote: > > In fact I think we should take a look how far we really want to break > down the various components. What really should be extracted. Although > there are various possibilities to split Karaf I would roughly suggest > something like: management, web, clustering, spring (to finally get > the spring things out of the "real" core :)). Since there are 13 PMCs > (if Jamie stays at releasing karaf-core there are still 12 remaining) > I think it should be possible to find 4 PMCs willing to take over the > release process for those components. I have no problem taking one > myself (which means 3 remaining :))... > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> > wrote: >> The website just requires committer status. >> >> According to this a PMC is 'preferred', as the PMCs are responsible >> for their projects distribution directory at Apache. >> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain >> >> >> Cheers, >> Jamie >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:49 PM, mikevan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> jgoodyear wrote: >>>> >>>> As a reminder our release process is posted here: >>>> http://karaf.apache.org/index/developers/release-guide.html >>>> >>>> To my knowledge those instructions should be sufficient to allow >>>> anyone the ability to perform a Karaf release, the only caveat I >>>> believe is that they have committer status as its required to perform >>>> tags & uploads (not sure if PMC is required or not when it comes to >>>> nexus). >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Jamie >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jamie G. >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Very true Mike. I've been picking up release duties as required. I >>>>> have no claim at all to doing them other than if/when I'm actively >>>>> assigned and working upon a particular release Jira task. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Jamie >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:04 PM, mikevan >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Christian Schneider wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think clustering is important enough to be part of the enterprise >>>>>>> features. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 04.05.2011 14:01, schrieb Ioannis Canellos: >>>>>>>> Guys, we are getting off topic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Even though I like Guillaume's ideas about central repository etc, >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> still hypothetical since the mechanism is not implemented yet and >>>>>>>> thus >>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>> can't base our decisions on that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What we currently have is standard/enterprise features descriptor. >>>>>>>> What I >>>>>>>> am >>>>>>>> saying is that clustering should be part of the enterprise features >>>>>>>> descriptor *(and probably hosted as subproject)*. Once we implement >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> central repository mechanism we can move it there. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Guillaume >>>>>>>> Nodet<[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Subprojects sounds like a good idea on the face, but it really comes >>>>>> down to >>>>>> a management issue. Who is going to be responsible for each >>>>>> sub-project? >>>>>> Right now we have a few folks who are working on Karaf in addition to >>>>>> other >>>>>> open-source projects. IMHO, we should not have a sub-project unless >>>>>> we >>>>>> have >>>>>> someone willing to be responsible for it. I also don't think Jamie >>>>>> should >>>>>> be that one person for all sub-projects. However, if we can get >>>>>> folks >>>>>> to >>>>>> accept responsiblity for them, I think its a great idea. >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> Mike Van (aka karafman) >>>>>> Karaf Team (Contributor) >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899307.html >>>>>> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> Hmm.. I thought PMC was required for a release, or is that just for the >>> site? >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Van (aka karafman) >>> Karaf Team (Contributor) >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899495.html >>> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >
Is this different than what Guillaume originally suggested? The original suggestion seemed aimed more at creating customer distributions of Karaf, and this seems like breaking up optional functionality into subprojects... I'm a tad confused. ----- Mike Van (aka karafman) Karaf Team (Contributor) -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899744.html Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
