Very true Mike. I've been picking up release duties as required. I have no claim at all to doing them other than if/when I'm actively assigned and working upon a particular release Jira task.
Cheers, Jamie On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:04 PM, mikevan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Christian Schneider wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> I think clustering is important enough to be part of the enterprise >> features. >> >> Christian >> >> Am 04.05.2011 14:01, schrieb Ioannis Canellos: >>> Guys, we are getting off topic. >>> >>> Even though I like Guillaume's ideas about central repository etc, it is >>> still hypothetical since the mechanism is not implemented yet and thus we >>> can't base our decisions on that. >>> >>> What we currently have is standard/enterprise features descriptor. What I >>> am >>> saying is that clustering should be part of the enterprise features >>> descriptor *(and probably hosted as subproject)*. Once we implement the >>> central repository mechanism we can move it there. >>> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> -- >> ---- >> http://www.liquid-reality.de >> > > Subprojects sounds like a good idea on the face, but it really comes down to > a management issue. Who is going to be responsible for each sub-project? > Right now we have a few folks who are working on Karaf in addition to other > open-source projects. IMHO, we should not have a sub-project unless we have > someone willing to be responsible for it. I also don't think Jamie should > be that one person for all sub-projects. However, if we can get folks to > accept responsiblity for them, I think its a great idea. > > ----- > Mike Van (aka karafman) > Karaf Team (Contributor) > -- > View this message in context: > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899307.html > Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
