Andreas Pieber wrote:
> 
> In fact i proposed two things :-) one to cut down the number of
> distributions into online and offline depending on the number of packages
> they contain and virtually any number of distributions based on features
> making them visible during the startup. The second one is to split the
> "non-core" parts out of karaf to keep a sleek karaf core.
> 
> It is neither exactly what Guillaume proposed, nor anybody else, but
> rather
> a mixture ;-)
> 
> So I think this some up my ideas explained in more detail quite well. I am
> currently on my mobile phone. I can write this down in more detail once I
> am
> back to my PC if required.
> 
> Kind regards Andreas
> On May 4, 2011 7:15 PM, "mikevan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>
>>> In fact I think we should take a look how far we really want to break
>>> down the various components. What really should be extracted. Although
>>> there are various possibilities to split Karaf I would roughly suggest
>>> something like: management, web, clustering, spring (to finally get
>>> the spring things out of the "real" core :)). Since there are 13 PMCs
>>> (if Jamie stays at releasing karaf-core there are still 12 remaining)
>>> I think it should be possible to find 4 PMCs willing to take over the
>>> release process for those components. I have no problem taking one
>>> myself (which means 3 remaining :))...
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jamie G.
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> The website just requires committer status.
>>>>
>>>> According to this a PMC is 'preferred', as the PMCs are responsible
>>>> for their projects distribution directory at Apache.
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Jamie
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:49 PM, mikevan
>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> jgoodyear wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a reminder our release process is posted here:
>>>>>> http://karaf.apache.org/index/developers/release-guide.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To my knowledge those instructions should be sufficient to allow
>>>>>> anyone the ability to perform a Karaf release, the only caveat I
>>>>>> believe is that they have committer status as its required to perform
>>>>>> tags & uploads (not sure if PMC is required or not when it comes to
>>>>>> nexus).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Jamie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jamie G.
>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Very true Mike. I've been picking up release duties as required. I
>>>>>>> have no claim at all to doing them other than if/when I'm actively
>>>>>>> assigned and working upon a particular release Jira task.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Jamie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:04 PM, mikevan
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christian Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think clustering is important enough to be part of the
>>>>>>>>> enterprise
>>>>>>>>> features.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 04.05.2011 14:01, schrieb Ioannis Canellos:
>>>>>>>>>> Guys, we are getting off topic.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Even though I like Guillaume's ideas about central repository
>>>>>>>>>> etc,
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> still hypothetical since the mechanism is not implemented yet and
>>>>>>>>>> thus
>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> can't base our decisions on that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What we currently have is standard/enterprise features
>>>>>>>>>> descriptor.
>>>>>>>>>> What I
>>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>>> saying is that clustering should be part of the enterprise
> features
>>>>>>>>>> descriptor *(and probably hosted as subproject)*. Once we
> implement
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> central repository mechanism we can move it there.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Guillaume
>>>>>>>>>> Nodet<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Subprojects sounds like a good idea on the face, but it really
>>>>>>>> comes
>>>>>>>> down to
>>>>>>>> a management issue.  Who is going to be responsible for each
>>>>>>>> sub-project?
>>>>>>>> Right now we have a few folks who are working on Karaf in addition
> to
>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> open-source projects.  IMHO, we should not have a sub-project
>>>>>>>> unless
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> someone willing to be responsible for it.  I also don't think Jamie
>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>> be that one person for all sub-projects.  However, if we can get
>>>>>>>> folks
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> accept responsiblity for them, I think its a great idea.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>> Mike Van (aka karafman)
>>>>>>>> Karaf Team (Contributor)
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899307.html
>>>>>>>> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm.. I thought PMC was required for a release, or is that just for
>>>>> the
>>>>> site?
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Mike Van (aka karafman)
>>>>> Karaf Team (Contributor)
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899495.html
>>>>> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Is this different than what Guillaume originally suggested? The original
>> suggestion seemed aimed more at creating customer distributions of Karaf,
>> and this seems like breaking up optional functionality into
>> subprojects...
> 
>> I'm a tad confused.
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Van (aka karafman)
>> Karaf Team (Contributor)
>> --
>> View this message in context:
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899744.html
>> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 


I like this approach, Andreas.

-----
Mike Van (aka karafman)
Karaf Team (Contributor)
--
View this message in context: 
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Subprojects-was-VOTE-Add-Cellar-into-Karaf-trunk-tp2897884p2899862.html
Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to