I'm not sure to understand your objections. Having a tar/gz with karaf + cellar already installed makes things easier to consume for end users. Same for karaf + web, which gives you a ready to use web container.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 13:00, Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't mind hosting it as a subproject. > > I disagree on having a separate distribution. Currently we have the minimal > distribution and everyone who wants a minimalistic Karaf can build on top of > that. I don't see any added value in having multiple distributions. > > Till this day, I didn't see any anyone complain about enterprise features > (tx, jpa), nor did we create a distribution for them. > > > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > http://iocanel.blogspot.com > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer > * > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com Connect at CamelOne May 24-26 The Open Source Integration Conference http://camelone.com/
