On 18 August 2011 13:10, Christian Schneider <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 18.08.2011 08:11, schrieb David Jencks: >> >> Our feature names are quite short (e.g. "jndi") and it seems to me this is >> likely to cause confusion when features get more widely adopted. Would it >> make sense to change them to be more like typical symbolic names, eg. >> "org.apache.karaf.feature.jndi"? >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> > Basically I like this. The problem is that it makes code completion on the > shell much less helpful. For example if many features start with > org.apache.camel. Then you have to type quite bit before the completion can > help.
The completion could use name.contains() rather than name.startsWith() when choosing which completion names to use? Might require a bit of a change to the shell completion though to only output common prefixes of matches etc. -- James ------- FuseSource Email: [email protected] Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration and Messaging
