nothing to add; +1 for both ideas. We should only add issues to not forget about them :-)
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 14:59, Christian Schneider <[email protected]>wrote: > Btw. that would be really cool if we could support > completion of o.a.c to org.apache.camel :-) > > Christian > > > Am 18.08.2011 14:26, schrieb Achim Nierbeck: > > hm, I'm not sure, >> but AFAIR the completion should help you also with the o.a.c stuff :-) >> >> and if it doesn't we should make sure it does :) >> >> regards, Achim >> >> 2011/8/18 Christian >> Schneider<chris@die-schneider.**net<[email protected]> >> >: >> >>> Am 18.08.2011 08:11, schrieb David Jencks: >>> >>>> Our feature names are quite short (e.g. "jndi") and it seems to me this >>>> is >>>> likely to cause confusion when features get more widely adopted. Would >>>> it >>>> make sense to change them to be more like typical symbolic names, eg. >>>> "org.apache.karaf.feature.**jndi"? >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> david jencks >>>> >>>> >>>> Basically I like this. The problem is that it makes code completion on >>> the >>> shell much less helpful. For example if many features start with >>> org.apache.camel. Then you have to type quite bit before the completion >>> can >>> help. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> Christian Schneider >>> http://www.liquid-reality.de >>> >>> Open Source Architect >>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Open Source Architect > Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com > >
