Well, maybe this was just a side effect of changing the way the distribution is built, I don't recall any discussion around that, but I may have missed something. I'm not sure it's really easy to revert that change, so maybe renaming the scripts would be easier.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Guillaume, > > If we agree that we have a single distribution (which I don't like as a pure > Unix people ;)), I have no problem to rename it. > > We just have to update dependant scripts (in admin, start, stop, etc). > > Regards > JB > > On 11/30/2011 08:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >> Originally, the distribution did not contain both unix and windows >> files (there are 2 different distributions in 2.x), but given we now >> have a single distribution containing both files, it seems to me a bit >> more homogeneous to have ".bat" for windows batches and ".sh" for unix >> scripts. >> So I'm *slightly* inclined to rename those, but that's not really a >> big problem to me. If it can help some users, why not .... >> >> Jean-Baptiste, do you see any problem with renaming those files apart >> from the fact that it's not really necessary on unix (so I do agree >> that it's not a requirement). >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Andres, >>> >>> My comments: >>> >>> 1/ the windows script as .bat extension because it's a requirement on >>> Windows >>> 2/ the important thing is the header (#!/bin/sh) in the unix script more >>> than the extension. >>> 3/ it's really important, for portability, to use /bin/sh (which allow us >>> to >>> use with bash, zsh on Linux, csh and ksh on Solaris/AIX) more than >>> /bin/bash >>> >>> I don't see a good reason to rename to karaf.sh, karaf looks very good >>> for >>> me. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 11/30/2011 05:21 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey guys, >>>> >>>> I want to start a discussion about this JIRA here on the dev list: TBH >>>> I'm >>>> personally quite indifferent but if we want to change this we should do >>>> it >>>> now for 3.0 or otherwise it wont happen for quite a long time (till >>>> 4.0). >>>> >>>> So, WDYT? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Andreas >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Andrei Pozolotin (Created) (JIRA)<[email protected]> >>>> Date: Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 23:45 >>>> Subject: [jira] [Created] (KARAF-1060) use bash file extenstions: karaf >>>> -> >>>> karaf.sh >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> use bash file extenstions: karaf -> karaf.sh >>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Key: KARAF-1060 >>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1060 >>>> Project: Karaf >>>> Issue Type: Bug >>>> Reporter: Andrei Pozolotin >>>> >>>> >>>> currently, windows /bin files have extensions, such as >>>> karaf.bat >>>> >>>> but unix, do not: >>>> karaf >>>> >>>> I suggest to use, instead: >>>> karaf.sh >>>> >>>> so that I can associate *.sh with bash editors like this >>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/shelled/ >>>> >>>> :-) >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA >>>> administrators: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa >>>> For more information on JIRA, see: >>>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >> >> >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
