On Monday, December 26, 2011 8:13:39 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Once again, a lot of karaf users just want OSGi. People who want to deploy > cxf or camel should be targetted to ServiceMix instead.
This is where I STRONGLY disagree with you. If people want to deploy CXF or Camel into OSGi, we should be working on making that easier and work better if at all possible, not point them off to another project. Installing CXF should just be a features:addurl and a features:install. People may already have OSGi based applications that they want to add CXF or Camel services into. They definitely shouldn't be required to switch to ServiceMix for that. I'm hoping your activator idea can really get us there. If that works well, then I'm hoping the above can really become a reality. Dan > > On Monday, December 26, 2011, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agree Ioannis, > > > > I think that 95% of the users don't know the issue, the jre.properties, > > etc :) > > > They just want to use Camel or CXF directly in Karaf. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 12/26/2011 04:13 PM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > >> Is there any chance that there are users that prefer the jre packages > >> ? > >> > >> From what I understand most Karaf users will not use them at all, > >> but I > > am > > >> not sure about it. > >> > >> If most of our users, will disable them anyway, I see no reason not > >> doing it ourselves ( +1 ). > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > [email protected] > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
