Hey David, You're right. I did wrong assumption that patch contains some webconsole stuff. I also saw the ds plugin so I thought that there will be next.
Sorry for misunderstanding. Łukasz Dywicki -- Code-House http://code-house.org Wiadomość napisana przez David Jencks w dniu 2012-01-10, o godz. 00:00: > Łukasz, > > Maybe you know more about the felix webconsole than I do.... I see this: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/webconsole-plugins/ds > > This looks to me like a felix webconsole plugin for dealing with scr. > > BTW felix scr does provide some console commands and they work but they don't > show up as available with our tab completion. My impression is the Scott's > new ones are slightly more capable. > > thanks > david jencks > > On Jan 9, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote: > >> Hey Scott, >> Many thanks for providing the patch. Lack of the scr commands was our issue >> from ages, thanks to you we finally have some support in many areas. I am >> with David about dropping the dependencies to the EventAdmin and MetaType >> services. Indeed, they're usefullt and let have more features in webconsole >> but they're not mandatory for running SCR. We can make a note in manual >> about SCR support to install this and that to see more. >> >> Only two things which makes me afraid is the WebConsole plugin. I not going >> to create a noise, but wouldn't it be better to donate a webconsole plugin >> directly to Felix? Felix team takes care about the core of webconsole and >> its development. We just do the plugins for things specific to Karaf like >> administration of instances or feature repositories. >> >> I've put some basic support for SCR last week to WebConsole subproject but >> it doesn't affect the core of the Karaf. >> >> Łukasz Dywicki >> -- >> Code-House >> http://code-house.org >> >> >> Wiadomość napisana przez David Jencks w dniu 2012-01-09, o godz. 05:40: >> >>> >>> On Jan 8, 2012, at 2:51 PM, sully6768 wrote: >>> >>>> For the moment the SCR feature has to be loaded first or as part of the web >>>> console. Maybe that would be the best option and load it as part of the >>>> web >>>> console feature. Thoughts? >>> >>> I don't see the problem in having them separate. People may want the web >>> console without scr, and we shouldn't force them to install scr. I think >>> it would be better to put the scr webconsole bit into a scr module, but I >>> don't know where the code is. In felix trunk there appears to be a >>> webconsole plugin for ds support, but it doesn't look like its been >>> released (version is 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT). >>> >>>> >>>> Also, I just attached a patch to KARAF-52 for the console color output. I >>>> tried it with several color consoles and it seems to be clear. Let me know >>>> what you think. >>> >>> I applied this, thanks! >>> >>> david jencks >>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/SCR-Tools-for-Karaf-tp3641090p3643203.html >>>> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >
