+1 on back-porting parts of new features to a 2.3. after the 3.0 line :)
2012/1/16 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > Agree, > > We can add it in 2.3 when we will create it after the 3.0. > > Regards > JB > > > On 01/16/2012 11:48 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> I wonder if we should defer adding new features to the stable branch >> and instead create a 2.3 branch in the future where we could backport >> some new features from 3.x in the 2.x line. >> >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:07, Ioannis Canellos<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I think that it would make sense to also have it in karaf 2.2.x branch. >>> What do you think? >>> >>> -- >>> *Ioannis Canellos* >>> * >>> FuseSource<http://fusesource.**com <http://fusesource.com>> >>> >>> ** >>> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com >>> ** >>> Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/**> Committer& PMC >>> >>> Apache Camel<http://camel.apache.org/**> Committer >>> Apache >>> ServiceMix<http://servicemix.**apache.org/<http://servicemix.apache.org/>> >>> Committer >>> Apache >>> Gora<http://incubator.apache.**org/gora/<http://incubator.apache.org/gora/>> >>> Committer >>> Apache >>> DirectMemory<http://incubator.**apache.org/directmemory/<http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/>> >>> Committer >>> * >>> >> >> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
