+1 on back-porting parts of new features to a 2.3. after the 3.0 line as well.
I believe that's been discussed as the plan :) Cheers, Jamie On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on back-porting parts of new features to a 2.3. after the 3.0 line :) > > > > 2012/1/16 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > >> Agree, >> >> We can add it in 2.3 when we will create it after the 3.0. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On 01/16/2012 11:48 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >>> I wonder if we should defer adding new features to the stable branch >>> and instead create a 2.3 branch in the future where we could backport >>> some new features from 3.x in the 2.x line. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:07, Ioannis Canellos<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I think that it would make sense to also have it in karaf 2.2.x branch. >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Ioannis Canellos* >>>> * >>>> FuseSource<http://fusesource.**com <http://fusesource.com>> >>>> >>>> ** >>>> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com >>>> ** >>>> Apache Karaf<http://karaf.apache.org/**> Committer& PMC >>>> >>>> Apache Camel<http://camel.apache.org/**> Committer >>>> Apache >>>> ServiceMix<http://servicemix.**apache.org/<http://servicemix.apache.org/>> >>>> Committer >>>> Apache >>>> Gora<http://incubator.apache.**org/gora/<http://incubator.apache.org/gora/>> >>>> Committer >>>> Apache >>>> DirectMemory<http://incubator.**apache.org/directmemory/<http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/>> >>>> Committer >>>> * >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
