Hi, ok, I'd like to get the discussion into the dev-list away from the jira issue :-)
Now, I've heard both sides of the story and tbh, it's not an easy thing here. I agree that it's not a understandable solution to have bootloaded jars with a karaf- prefix. I'm not sure about the bundle looking for external jars in the lib folder, it feels almost like an extra file-installer thing bound to the lib folder. @Dan could you please elaborate your use-case for placing your custom libraries in this folder and how you use them? I also agree that a JDBC driver should be used as a bundle and not like a bootloader jar, though I'm not sure if this is also doable for the failover configuration. One of the comments mentioned that it might be a better solution to look for bootloaded jars in the lib/karaf folder. Right now to me it sounds most likely to be the only working solution. Especially since we do have those "extra" bundles that are managed by the karaf main class. regards, Achim 2013/5/13 Freeman Fang <[email protected]> > I'm also concerned about this change, added my comment in KARAF-1545 > －－－－－－－－－－－－－ > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ > Twitter: freemanfang > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com > http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 > weibo: @Freeman小屋 > > www.camelone.org : The open source integration conference: > > On 2013-5-13, at 下午1:53, Dan Tran wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have addressed my concerns on this enhancement, and would like to hear > > more from dev group. > > > > Big Thanks > > > > -Dan > > -- Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
