For karaf 2.x branches, we're still using pax-web 1.1.x which did not provide a features repository. Btw, I think we may want to consider upgrading karaf 2.4 to pax-web 3.0 if we plan to do a release on that branch.
2013/7/3 Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> > Hi, > > As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why don't we > include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for spring > and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML > features file ? > > > <repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-features/${pax.web.version}/xml/features</repository> > > Regards, > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >
