Agree with you Guillaume.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > For karaf 2.x branches, we're still using pax-web 1.1.x which did not > provide a features repository. > Btw, I think we may want to consider upgrading karaf 2.4 to pax-web 3.0 if > we plan to do a release on that branch. > > > 2013/7/3 Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> > > > Hi, > > > > As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why don't > we > > include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for > spring > > and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML > > features file ? > > > > > > > <repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-features/${pax.web.version}/xml/features</repository> > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Charles Moulliard > > Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat > > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
