Hi guys, I'd rather would like to see 3.0 next instead of a 2.4. It already contains pax-web 3.0 and Felix 4. We really should focus on this right now.
Regards, Achim Am Mittwoch, 17. Juli 2013 schrieb Claus Ibsen : > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > For karaf 2.x branches, we're still using pax-web 1.1.x which did not > > provide a features repository. > > Btw, I think we may want to consider upgrading karaf 2.4 to pax-web 3.0 > if > > we plan to do a release on that branch. > > > > If a Karaf 2.4 branch is in the works. Would considering upgrading to > Felix 4.0.x be possible? > > > > > > 2013/7/3 Charles Moulliard <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why > don't we > >> include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for > spring > >> and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML > >> features file ? > >> > >> > >> > <repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-features/${pax.web.version}/xml/features</repository> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> -- > >> Charles Moulliard > >> Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat > >> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > >> > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > Red Hat, Inc. > Email: [email protected] <javascript:;> > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > -- Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
