Hi JB, Thanks for clarifying.
Regards Benjamin On 20. Juni 2014 11:01:38 MESZ, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >Hi Benjamin, > >If you follow the discussion on the dev mailing list, I think the >release plan is well defined. >More over on the website you have the dependency matrix. > >We maintain two maintenance release branches: > >1/ 2.3.x is "previous" maintenance release >2/ 3.0.x is "current" maintenance release >3/ 4.0.0 is future (where we do the refactoring, etc, it would not be >released before September). >4/ 2.x (2.4.x) is "transition" branch between 2.3.x and 3.0.x. Not sure > >it would make much sense to release it now (I would encourage users to >jump from 2.3.x to 3.0.x). So no plan for now about a release. >That's why I didn't talk about 2.4 in my previous e-mail. > >I will add a page on the website to add this plan: >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-3060 > >I will do that in a couple of minutes. > >Regards >JB > >On 06/20/2014 10:37 AM, Benjamin Graf wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think this discussion shows that karaf needs an actual release and >> maintenance plan. Don't forget we still have 2.3.x and 2.x branch >used >> and developed. 2.4 will be an OSGi r5 release too. Well, that's >really >> confusing. ;-) >> >> Regards >> Benjamin >> >> On 19. Juni 2014 21:24:53 MESZ, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" ><j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Scott, >> >> to be clear, this is the current situation: >> >> Karaf 3.0.1 (latest release): Felix 4.2.1/Equinox 3.8.2, OSGi >r4.3 (and >> partial r5 support) >> Karaf 3.0.2 (next release, planned in a couple of weeks): Felix >> 4.4.0/Equinox 3.9.1, OSGi r5 >> Karaf 4.0.0 (future): Felix 4.4.0/Equinox 3.9.1, OSGi r5 >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 06/19/2014 08:27 PM, Scott Lewis wrote: >> >> On 6/19/2014 1:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Yes, it is but not yet released (it will be included in >> 3.0.2). I >> talked about the current version in 3.0.1 (latest >release). >> >> >> I'm a little confused about framework versions and Karaf >version. >> >> Is the conclusion that 3.0.1 (latest release) does not have >the >> Felix >> version that supports OSGi R5? But some version of Felix that >> supports >> R5 will be included in Karaf 3.0.2? >> >> If that's right: >> >> 1) When is Karaf 3.0.2 to be expected? >> 2) Which version of Felix will be included in 3.0.2? >> >> Thanksinadvance, >> >> Scott >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail >> gesendet. > >-- >Jean-Baptiste Onofré >jbono...@apache.org >http://blog.nanthrax.net >Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.