Hi I can't remember if it's been on the mailinglist or in the issue, but a user of our maven plugin just mentioned he uses one of the to-be-deleted goals for documentation purposes. Just as a little reminder, don't know if you had it on your screen, that we should consider those use-cases maybe usefull :-)
regards, Achim 2015-04-17 5:30 GMT+02:00 Freeman Fang <[email protected]>: > +1 for first set of names. > > Thanks > －－－－－－－－－－－－－ > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > On 2015-4-16, at 下午10:49, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > > I created KARAF-3671 for this discussion. > > > > I'm proposing the following: > > * remove features-add-to-repository goal > > * remove the features-validate-descriptor > > * rename install-kars goal to *assembly* > > * rename instance-create-archive to *archive* > > * rename verify-features to *verify* > > * rename features-create-kar to *kar* > > > > The other goals are: > > * features-export-meta-data > > * features-generate-descriptor > > * commands-generate-help > > and we'd have to find names more > > > > I'm not really sure the features-generate-descriptor is widely used. Is > it > > ? > > > > For the naming, another option is to keep the [resource]-[action] idiom: > > * assembly-create > > * assembly-archive > > * kar-create > > * commands-generate-help > > * features-verify > > * features-generate-descriptor > > * features-export-meta-data > > > > The first option seems more inline with usual maven plugins, and they > look > > nicer to me, but I don't really mind. > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > 2015-04-08 12:44 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>: > > > >> In master, the karat-maven-plugin contains the following goals: > >> * features-add-to-repository > >> * features-create-kar > >> * features-export-meta-data > >> * features-generate-descriptor > >> * install-kars > >> * features-validate-descriptor > >> * verify-features > >> > >> The features-add-to-repository mojo seems somewhat redundant with the > >> install-kars mojo which is used to build our own distribution. The > >> features-export-meta-data seems redundant with the > >> features-generate-descriptor, and the features-validate-descriptor seems > >> redundant with the verify-features goal. > >> > >> Am I missing something, or should we get rid of the > >> features-add-to-repository, features-export-meta-data and > >> features-generate-descriptor goals for 4.0 ? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Guillaume > >> > > -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
